Pat Buchanan Offends Anti-American Islam-Loving Libertarians

Editorial Comment: The Libertarian movement is not apt to get any traction in this country until they sort a couple of things out. First, being Islamic apologists has nothing to do with the Constitution. They are way off base with their politically correct ignorant support of mosque building. Let’s look at the First Amendment shall we?

Amendment I United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Now the media, and our all things Muslim president would like to have us believe that’s it a First Amendment issue, seriously, is Congress involved with the exception of perpetrating another hoax and fraud?

Issue number two, war. They just don’t seem to see the need for War. If it weren’t for the anti-war congress, and we began operating from a position of strength and retain the mantle of the only worlds super power. It is doubtful we would need to become involved.

The exception, jihad against America must be dealt with swiftly with a disproportional response. This is asymmetrical warfare. Jihadist’s want to become homicide bombers, with truck bombs, hide behind women and children, then they become casualties of war. The rules of the Geneva Convention do not apply, lift the rules of engagement from our troops. Get out of their way Washington.

Our country doesn’t fight politically correct wars, you want to lose, our troops risk their lives and are in it to win. True Americans want to win.

Attention members of congress and Mr. Obama Let’s start upholding your number one oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. I’m J.C.

Pat Buchanan has offended anti-American libertarians who think Islam is gentle.

Buchanan said the Ground Zero mosque is a development planned by a man with the “religious motivation of the Saudis who attacked the towers” and should not be built. This has Fred Reed of LewRockwell.com infuriated: America is not at war with Islam, prior to 9/11 America never considered Islam violent and by no means would alleged Muslims attack America. Reed blames America for Islamic violence — America is the bloodthirsty beast that created Muslim monsters and was never attacked by Islam.

If America is not at war with Islam, who are the maniacs screaming Allahu akbar every time Americans are attacked here and overseas?

The 9/11 attacks were not committed by Mazel Tov-screaming Jews. Other than radical leftist terrorist groups who always support Islam, attacks around the world are carried out by Muslim terrorists following world-conquering Islamic sharia law.

Reed’s radical libertarian view denounces Buchanan as a “yahoo,” insisting Americans are Christian brutes attacking Muslims:

Buchanan, of the American Conservative, [is] proclaiming that Islam is a Culture of Jihad, and most militant…Would it be poltroonish of me to note that just now Christian armies are busily annexing and wrecking Afghanistan and Iraq, having recently bombed Somalia? That they use robotic aircraft to murder Yemenis, that they hunt down Moslems in the Philippines (where after 1898 Americans engaged in atrocities that would win the admiration of the Japanese), encourage Israel to ruin Lebanon and to run a concentration camp for Moslems in Gaza, enthusiastically murder Pakistanis from the sky, and threaten Syria and Iran?

Leftist anti-American ideology indicts America as the controlling world conqueror and Islam as misunderstood because “not one Islamic nation is in the First World.” That’s because Muslims are too busy forcefully amalgamating the First World to their culture.

Note to Reed, Buchanan consistently says he is against the Iraq war. His magazine recently stated: “If we’re honest, since day one, the War on Terror has actually been a war for it.” Buchanan shares similar views of war—avoid unless

But it is Buchanan’s pro-West Christian statements against Islam that anger Reed.